Set the perimeter
Identify the asset population, cutoff date, meaningful segments, exclusions, and objective behind the review.
Fitzgerald Advisors · Direct portfolio brokerage
At a glance: Fitzgerald Advisors helps lenders and portfolio owners begin a confidential NPL and distressed-asset portfolio review focused on asset scope, readiness, and the next transaction step.
Transaction hub: NPL & Distressed: NPL sales
A defined starting point
An NPL or distressed-asset mandate is rarely one uniform pool. Before considering a sale, workout, or segmentation process, the owner needs a workable view of the population, documentation, material exceptions, servicing and legal context, and the objective behind the decision. Fitzgerald starts with that operating picture rather than implying a price or recovery outcome.
Asset scope
Identify the asset population, cutoff date, meaningful segments, exclusions, and objective behind the review.
Summarize the available account, collateral, legal, servicing, and documentation information without exposing sensitive data prematurely.
Decide whether the mandate merits additional preparation, a focused counterparty review, segmentation, a workout alternative, or another operating solution.
Illustrative transaction patterns
These are anonymized, non-transactional examples of information and decision patterns a broker-led review may involve. They are not representations of completed deals, current inventory, pricing, recovery, or closing results.
Illustrative pattern: an owner has a non-performing pool with different documentation conditions across segments. The first review separates the population, defines field meanings and cutoff, reconciles balances, logs exceptions, and determines whether a sale, segmentation, workout, or more preparation is the appropriate next discussion.
Illustrative pattern: a lender wants to understand whether a distressed pool is ready for qualified counterparty review. The work begins with servicing, legal, collateral, ownership, and data-room questions, not with a universal price or recovery assumption.
The first conversation
Clarify whether the owner is evaluating a sale, segmentation, a workout alternative, balance-sheet relief, or a general market-readiness review.
Define the product type, balance range, jurisdictions, status, available records, and material variations in the asset pool.
Establish what is known, what needs reconciliation, and what should remain controlled before the next stage.
A focused counterparty path is considered only when the mandate, evidence, and objective support it.
Before you reach out
The first discussion is about deciding whether a review is warranted. It is not a request for borrower-level files, a valuation promise, or a commitment to a sale process.
Confidential intake
Share the broad asset type, objective, available information, and timing for a confidential conversation. Keep borrower-level information and unredacted files out of the initial inquiry.
Direct answers
An NPL portfolio is a group of loans or credit exposures that are no longer performing under their payment or contractual terms. The relevant review considers the asset type, collateral, status, documents, servicing and legal context, exceptions, and owner objective.
An NPL sale typically moves from defining and reconciling the pool to controlled diligence, qualified buyer review, complete bid comparison, definitive documentation, and transfer. The process should be tailored to the asset and information condition rather than treated as a generic listing.
Material factors include loan and collateral type, balance and status data, payment or workout history, ownership and legal records, servicing capacity, documentation quality, material exceptions, confidentiality needs, and timing.
Asset-class paths: NPL seller intake · NPL buyer mandate
Discuss a portfolio mandate · Sell debt portfolios · Buy debt portfolios