Define the receivables
Separate obligor and contract types, invoice or account counts, balance basis, cutoff date, aging, payment status, dispute, litigation, and material exclusions.
Fitzgerald Advisors · Direct portfolio brokerage
Fitzgerald Advisors helps business owners, lenders, and specialty-finance teams evaluate a commercial receivables portfolio for a possible sale, structured transaction, or continued workout. Begin with the obligor type, contract and invoice record, approximate balance, aging or litigation stage, collections history, disputes, documentation, servicing, and timing. The first review determines whether a controlled broker-led process is appropriate; it does not promise a buyer, price, recovery, or closing.
At a glance: Sell a commercial receivables portfolio through a confidential, broker-led review of contracts, aging, disputes, documentation, collections, and transfer
Transaction hub: Commercial Receivables: sell commercial debt

A defined starting point
A commercial trade-receivables or B2B claim population can vary by contract terms, invoice support, obligor concentration, payment and dispute history, collection or litigation stage, guaranties, security interests, documentation, and servicing posture. Fitzgerald frames a seller mandate around those facts before qualified counterparties receive detailed files. This is a broker-led disposition review—not invoice factoring, a public listing, a collection-agency solicitation, or a claim about transaction availability.
Asset scope
Separate obligor and contract types, invoice or account counts, balance basis, cutoff date, aging, payment status, dispute, litigation, and material exclusions.
Inventory contracts, invoices, acceptance or delivery evidence where applicable, payment and collection history, correspondence, guaranties or security, legal records, servicing notes, and known gaps.
Start with aggregate business facts. Release detailed records only through a suitable confidentiality, permitted-use, approved-user, and diligence process.
A sale, financing, hold, collection, settlement, or segmented path can carry different cash-flow timing, conditions, costs, retained responsibilities, and risks. Do not compare headline consideration alone.
Illustrative transaction patterns
These are anonymized, non-transactional examples of information and decision patterns a broker-led review may involve. They are not representations of completed deals, current inventory, pricing, recovery, or closing results.
Illustrative pattern: a company has commercial accounts across multiple customer groups and wants to decide which receivables are appropriate for a disposition review. The first work is to identify the cutoff date, contract and invoice evidence, payment and dispute status, collection stage, concentration, exclusions, and the records that can be shared safely—not to assume the gross balance is saleable.
Illustrative pattern: a portfolio includes pre-litigation, litigation-stage, judgment-adjacent, settled, and disputed commercial claims. A useful review separates those stages, identifies counsel and record constraints, confirms assignment or transfer considerations, and makes exceptions visible before a counterparty sees account-level material.
Illustrative pattern: a prospective buyer specifies commercial obligor type, contract and invoice profile, aging, geography, litigation tolerance, capital source, collection or servicing capacity, diligence needs, and approval timing. That allows a broker to assess fit without claiming active inventory or sending sensitive files too early.
Commercial receivables, B2B accounts, and trade-receivable terms can describe different contracts, financing structures, collection stages, and transfer considerations. Fitzgerald uses the terms here to frame a broker-led seller review; the page does not provide legal, accounting, lending, servicing, or compliance advice.
The actual review depends on the defined population, cutoff date, contract and invoice evidence, aging, payment and collection history, disputes, legal posture, security or guaranty context, documentation, servicing, confidentiality controls, transfer restrictions, and complete transaction terms. No public source establishes buyer appetite, price, recovery, or sale readiness for a specific portfolio.
Primary context and controls
A practical review sequence
A credible commercial-receivables review keeps the population, supporting records, and decision path connected.
Obligor, contract type, balance basis, aging, status, concentration, and objective.
Invoices, agreements, payment and collection history, disputes, legal status, guaranties, servicing, and exceptions.
Seller readiness, qualified-counterparty fit, controlled diligence, complete terms, and transfer responsibilities.
The first conversation
Share the commercial receivable type, approximate scale, obligor or industry mix, aging or status, geography, objective, and timing at a business level.
Identify what contract, invoice, payment, collection, dispute, guaranty, legal, and servicing evidence exists, along with known gaps and restrictions.
Clarify the seller’s decision authority, confidentiality needs, excluded accounts or claims, and whether a sale, financing, hold, collection, settlement, or segmented alternative is under consideration.
If the mandate fits, the next discussion can define counterparty qualification, staged diligence, complete proposal terms, and transfer or transition requirements.
Before you reach out
The initial inquiry should contain aggregate business information only. Do not send customer-level personal information, unredacted account files, banking data, or confidential legal materials through the public form.
Confidential intake
Start with the commercial receivable type, approximate scale, aging or status, records available, material exceptions, objective, and timing. Keep sensitive account-level and legal files out of the first inquiry.
Commercial receivables Q&A
Direct answers about a confidential commercial receivables review, qualified buyer diligence, financing alternatives, restricted-status accounts, and process limits.
Start by defining the commercial receivables population, cutoff date, balance basis, contract and invoice evidence, aging or status, payment and collection history, disputes, legal context, servicing, exceptions, and seller objective. A focused process can then determine whether qualified counterparty review and staged diligence are appropriate.
A portfolio sale, a revolving receivables financing facility, and a factoring arrangement can involve different economics, control, servicing, legal, accounting, and transfer terms. The correct structure depends on the specific contracts, receivables, parties, objective, and negotiated documentation; it should not be assumed from a generic label.
At a high level, prepare the asset definition, cutoff date, contract and invoice inventory, aging or status, payment and collection history, dispute and litigation log, security or guaranty context, servicing information, exclusions, documentation gaps, and confidentiality requirements. Do not send account-level records through an initial public inquiry.
Buyers may review contract and invoice support, obligor concentration, aging, payment and collections history, disputes, offsets, legal status, collateral or guaranty context, documentation, servicing model, data controls, capital, authority, and timing. A review does not guarantee a bid or transaction.
Yes, a high-level review can clarify whether accounts in collection, pre-litigation, litigation, judgment, settlement, bankruptcy, or another status belong in the defined population, an exception category, or a separate path. The record, jurisdiction, documentation, servicing, confidentiality, and transfer conditions still need review; the status alone does not establish sale readiness, buyer interest, price, recovery, or closing.
No. Fitzgerald Advisors does not guarantee buyer interest, price, recovery, transaction availability, or closing. Outcomes depend on the specific asset, evidence, counterparties, applicable requirements, and negotiated terms.
Research for this transaction path
Supporting articles for this hub. Use them to prepare a defined mandate, then return here for the appropriate next step.
Related guide Off-market fintech and BNPL portfolio sales
Discuss a portfolio mandate · Sell debt portfolios · Buy debt portfolios
A direct broker desk for qualified buyers and sellers of debt, loan, judgment, CRE, note, and specialty-finance portfolios.